🔗 Share this article

Last year, actor Jude Law remarked he had no concerns about backlash for playing the Russian leader in a new film. This production, however, could coincide so closely with the mythologized image circulated by official channels that, within Russia, it functions as a compliment instead of a challenge.

The Crafted Strongman

Over a long period, the Kremlin and its pop-culture machine have collaborated to craft a tailor-made version of Putin. This character is a political superhero devoid of flaws, a former spy reframed as a Russian James Bond who consistently understands beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long eclipsed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

A notable instance is a television show released last October, helmed by a pro-government filmmaker. The protagonist is a fictional blue-eyed lieutenant colonel selected by fate to “rescue” the nation from disorder. Although the character's name Mikhail, the message is unmistakable: the savior must be a familiar security officer.

International depictions often end up buttressing this identical story rather than debunking it. A new film based on a bestselling satirical novel sets out to undermine the leader's mythology by presenting him as a symptom but as a symptom, moving the focus to the spin doctors surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

On screen, the president is presented as having been picked by powerful oligarchs to stabilise the country because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. The oligarchs approach him and practically plead him to become president. His response is that he would prefer to rule from the shadows, seeking enduring influence.

This narrative is the Kremlin’s export myth: the cool, reluctant strategist guided by fate. In reality, none of this ever happened.

The Truth Behind the Selection

Nobody actually pleaded with Putin to take the job. The presidency was effectively a casting call with many candidates. Central to this process stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who expected to run the state de facto.

• The shortlist featured various figures, including a reformer later murdered and a former spy chief.
• According to a journalist who researched Putin’s biography, the chosen candidate simply fitted the required parameters: loyal, from the intelligence world, and politically neutral.
• A property developer close to the events stated the key criterion was controllability and faithfulness, not leadership.

“The goal wasn't a strong candidate, they needed someone controllable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Experts agree that the notion of him as a powerful KGB spy was constructed retrospectively. Stories about his “recruitment work” in East Germany fall apart under examination. In essence, he handled paperwork and technical tasks, a low-level clerk not engaged in actual agent work.

Curiously, the move to framing him as a “007” could partly have been triggered by Daniel Craig’s arrival as 007. His harder version led local outlets and social media to make comparisons with Putin. Edited images replacing the actor's likeness with Putin’s surfaced on Moscow streets, fueling the growing tendency to frame him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an actor well-liked by viewers there, the authorities will not miss the chance to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. Its omission of public dissent, the political rivals, or key figures from its narrative, even though it includes the past decade, is a pleasant bonus for state propaganda.

Domestically, the president is frequently an omnipotent figure who remains unseen directly. His influence is signaled through portraits or orders from on high. Now, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that may inadvertently validate the very myths it might seek to examine.